Tech and the law sector: an academic perspective

The legal sector is not immune to the onslaught of technology as it increasingly emerges within business. Nigel Hudson, a senior lecturer at Nottingham Law School, offers his perspective on these technological developments.

  • Last updated May 4, 2018 2:10:48 PM
  • Nigel Hudson, Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School

The impact of technology in legal practice over the last 30 years since I qualified as a solicitor has been amazing to observe. My working environment back in 1988 was a world of Dictaphones, typewriters, and Filofaxes. Today, it’s a brave new world of blockchain, smart contracts, and predictive analysis brought about by the rapid development and advancement of artificial intelligence. In a short article such as this, it is impossible to go into length about the breadth and depth of disruption currently taking place in legal practice but here is an attempt to highlight some of the areas that aspiring lawyers of today must focus on.

Deloitte, one of the ‘Big 6’ accounting firms, in signalling their intention to compete in the growing legal management services market, identified what they called ‘the 3 As’ of technology disruption: Automation; Analytics; and Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’). Each of these areas is already greatly affecting the way legal services are currently provided and their effect will be exponential in years to come.

When I qualified, draft documents would go back and forth in hard copy between the solicitors acting for both sides, with amendments and re-amendments handwritten in red, blue, and (if necessary) green ink before a final draft was produced. The final draft would then have to be checked against the ‘travelling draft’ which often entailed one lawyer sitting down and reading out the final version whilst another lawyer checked it against the draft on which the amendments had been recorded. Today, there are document automation systems such as Thomson Reuters’s Contract Express and Leverton’s AI applications that automate document production and analysis more accurately and in a fraction of the time. Other systems such as iManage’s RAVN, Neota Logic, Kira Systems, and Luminance harness powerful AI to analyse data contained in legal documents, creating risk assessment reports and valuable insight into the acceptability of certain clauses which is more efficient and reliable than a human.

Just recently, Ravel, which originated from a collaboration of Stanford University’s Law School and Computer Science Department in 2012, announced that it would be joining with LexisNexis to exploit its predictive case analysis software. This software can analyse cases and look for trends to assist in decisions on how to conduct litigation such as whether a particular line of argument has been successful or not, and what view a particular judge may take if a case is presented in a certain way. Earlier this year, young legal service entrepreneur, Ludwig Bull, pitted his company’s CaseCruncher predictive analysis software in a Man v Machine contest against human lawyers to predict the outcomes of cases over the course of a week. The machine won convincingly.

It’s obvious that the lawyers of tomorrow will have to know how to use this technology and understand how AI can help. The question is, are they or will they be prepared? Many are preoccupied by the impending Solicitors Qualifying Examination (‘SQE’). However, it is no good looking to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) to provide leadership in this area. After all, their most recent draft assessment specification, on which competence to be a solicitor will be based, does not mention the word “technology” once in all of its 99 pages. Hope is to be gained however from a reinvigorated Law Society under the guidance of its next President, Christina Blacklaws. She has been a very vocal supporter of LawTech and appears to be an enthusiastic advocate of its use at the forefront of innovation in the provision of legal services in the future.

There is no doubt that we live in exciting times. The current disruption in legal practice brought about by LawTech has launched us on a voyage of uncertainty at a frightening pace to a destination we know not where. The ship is sailing and it’s time to jump onboard. 

Nigel Hudson, Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School

More like this

  • No more memes? Some of the world’s strangest legislations Megan Johnstone

    Memes, gum, and dying within a certain boundary. Who would've thought they'd be illegal? Here are some of the strangest laws from around the world.

  • SQE: first programme details announced for related Law Conversion Course Becky Kells

    BPP is the first law school to announce the details of its Law Conversion Course under the new SQE framework.

  • Case study: the intricacies of international law in relation to cultural heritage Tuula Petersen

    Standfirst: The protection of cultural heritage is essential to safeguard artefacts, sites and various intangible features of a society’s past. However, the idea of cultural heritage is not without any limitations. How exactly does international law protect artefacts—and when does it let them down? 

  • The 1824 Vagrancy Act: rogues, vagabonds and a dated take on homelessness?Anna Vall Navés

    If the law is both a result of the way we perceive the world and an influence on it, then—as many campaigners and politicians have recently argued—the 1824 Vagrancy Act may not be the most positive reflection of our society. But what exactly is the Vagrancy Act, and are there alternatives to tackling homelessness?

  • Work-life balance: Do you need to move firms, or can you have the best of both worlds?Matthew Kay

    Matthew Kay, director of Vario for Pinsent Masons, offers further insight into the ways that lawyers can work flexibly in the 2019 career landscape.