Tech and the law sector: an academic perspective

The legal sector is not immune to the onslaught of technology as it increasingly emerges within business. Nigel Hudson, a senior lecturer at Nottingham Law School, offers his perspective on these technological developments.

  • Last updated 04-May-2018 14:10:48
  • Nigel Hudson, Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School
Placeholder

The impact of technology in legal practice over the last 30 years since I qualified as a solicitor has been amazing to observe. My working environment back in 1988 was a world of Dictaphones, typewriters, and Filofaxes. Today, it’s a brave new world of blockchain, smart contracts, and predictive analysis brought about by the rapid development and advancement of artificial intelligence. In a short article such as this, it is impossible to go into length about the breadth and depth of disruption currently taking place in legal practice but here is an attempt to highlight some of the areas that aspiring lawyers of today must focus on.

Deloitte, one of the ‘Big 6’ accounting firms, in signalling their intention to compete in the growing legal management services market, identified what they called ‘the 3 As’ of technology disruption: Automation; Analytics; and Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’). Each of these areas is already greatly affecting the way legal services are currently provided and their effect will be exponential in years to come.

When I qualified, draft documents would go back and forth in hard copy between the solicitors acting for both sides, with amendments and re-amendments handwritten in red, blue, and (if necessary) green ink before a final draft was produced. The final draft would then have to be checked against the ‘travelling draft’ which often entailed one lawyer sitting down and reading out the final version whilst another lawyer checked it against the draft on which the amendments had been recorded. Today, there are document automation systems such as Thomson Reuters’s Contract Express and Leverton’s AI applications that automate document production and analysis more accurately and in a fraction of the time. Other systems such as iManage’s RAVN, Neota Logic, Kira Systems, and Luminance harness powerful AI to analyse data contained in legal documents, creating risk assessment reports and valuable insight into the acceptability of certain clauses which is more efficient and reliable than a human.

Just recently, Ravel, which originated from a collaboration of Stanford University’s Law School and Computer Science Department in 2012, announced that it would be joining with LexisNexis to exploit its predictive case analysis software. This software can analyse cases and look for trends to assist in decisions on how to conduct litigation such as whether a particular line of argument has been successful or not, and what view a particular judge may take if a case is presented in a certain way. Earlier this year, young legal service entrepreneur, Ludwig Bull, pitted his company’s CaseCruncher predictive analysis software in a Man v Machine contest against human lawyers to predict the outcomes of cases over the course of a week. The machine won convincingly.

It’s obvious that the lawyers of tomorrow will have to know how to use this technology and understand how AI can help. The question is, are they or will they be prepared? Many are preoccupied by the impending Solicitors Qualifying Examination (‘SQE’). However, it is no good looking to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) to provide leadership in this area. After all, their most recent draft assessment specification, on which competence to be a solicitor will be based, does not mention the word “technology” once in all of its 99 pages. Hope is to be gained however from a reinvigorated Law Society under the guidance of its next President, Christina Blacklaws. She has been a very vocal supporter of LawTech and appears to be an enthusiastic advocate of its use at the forefront of innovation in the provision of legal services in the future.

There is no doubt that we live in exciting times. The current disruption in legal practice brought about by LawTech has launched us on a voyage of uncertainty at a frightening pace to a destination we know not where. The ship is sailing and it’s time to jump onboard. 

Nigel Hudson, Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School

More like this

  • Can the law change how we behave?Emma Finamore

    Does legislation change the way we think and behave? Do we require ‘nudges’ from state institutions to change how we conduct ourselves, or do humans have too much autonomy and free will to be controlled like that? We look at real-life examples of legislation that could be seen as having an impact on behaviour.

  • The changing roles of lawyersAlex May

    The difference between barristers and solicitors is becoming less distinct. ALEX MAY explores whether there is good reason to keep two different legal professions, or if it is inevitable that they will merge, as in most other countries.

  • Legal-process outsourcing: is it the future? Jan Hill

    JAN HILL looks into one of the fastest-growing trends in the legal industry: legal-process outsourcing (LPO) companies. 

  • Why finding a mentor is a good ideaLinda Lamb, Director, LSL family law

    A mentor can be a fulfilling relationship that will be an asset to your legal career. Here, Linda Lamb explains further why finding a mentor is a good idea.

  • Spotlight on: Gabrielle Turnquest By Elizabeth Hurst

    Gabrielle Turnquest is used to breaking records. She is the youngest person to be called to the Bar in over 600 years, passing the exam at the age of 18—almost a decade earlier than the average BPTC graduate. Even with her additional undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, there’s no sign of Turnquest stopping just yet…